Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joy R's avatar

The West's recent attacks on free speech: Richard Medhurst and Pavlov Durov, and the FBI's attempted intimidation of Scott Ritter, are ominous. It suggests that the West is clearing the decks for a big MSM propaganda effort on the coming WW3. Why now? Because all of the major oil producing nations are embracing BRICS+, and are some of 159 nations heading to the BRICS+ conference in Kazan in October. This is terrifying western nations, all of whom are in economic decline, partly due to the stupidity of taking on Russia, and threatening China and Iran.

It is not for nothing that Russia sent naval vessels to Cuba, months ago. I think that Doctorow is right. Though a Russian defence person spoke of obliterating the UK, that would still leave the head of the serpent in tact. Russia is closely watching every US move, and the minute it threatens Russia Washington will be toast. There is so much hubris in the Washington Consensus that the big worry is that they will ignore all the red flags that Russia is flying.

And what of the middle east? Why hasn't Iran struck back? Russia has been helping Iran get all its ducks in a row with S-400s, and I'm told S-500s, too. They appear to be playing the attrition game, because it will be much less costly to their civilians and infrastructure, They know that Israel grows weaker economically, and militarily, by the day, while their defences grow much stronger.

We live in interesting, but very dangerous, times.

Expand full comment
richardstevenhack's avatar

I listened to Doctorow's concepts in a couple of places. As Scott Ritter and Larry Johnson pointed out, he's not a military expert and his 100-plane nuclear attack from the Med is fantasy - the planes would need refueling and that's hardly a "surprise attack. Of course, as Doctorow points out, what matters is what the Russians believe. But the Russian General Staff knows a fantasy when they see one, too.

Ritter has been hammering away at the likelihood that Russia will hit the US with nukes if US missiles are used by Ukraine inside Russia. I doubt that. Russia can do all sort of damage to the US outside the continental US and using hypersonics with conventional warheads to do so. What matters is what the US does then, not what Russia does.

For now it seems clear that Russia is busy arming anti-US parties such as North Korea and Ansarallah as well as Iran with some of their "overflow" advanced aircraft, AD, and EW hardware, and probably intelligence as well.

And while the Russians may have to "trust" the US that F-16s in Ukraine are not carrying nukes, they also know the US would be insane to try a nuclear attack on Russia with a handful of F-16s, even under cover of the Ukraine war. This scenario reminds me of all the scenarios people talked about before the war, where every NATO exercise with a hundred planes or so was thought to be a "cover" for a "surprise attack on Russia." All of that was utter nonsense and this is, too. It simply can't be done without the sort of movement that would be telegraphed to the Russian (and Chinese) signals intelligence and ISR. You can't hide that units charged with nuclear materials handling are doing more today than they did yesterday. The US knows what Russia does in that regard and vice versa. WWIII will never be a "surprise" - it will be deliberate.

If the Ukrainians with US help launch missiles that do any significant damage inside Russia, the Russians will just increase use of their hypersonics and take out the bases involved in Poland and Romania after making sure Ukraine doesn't have any left. NATO won't do anything, because they can't.

The US may be planning a first strike on Russia for the future, but they aren't there, yet. As Ritter pointed out yesterday, most of the US nuclear assets are old, falling apart, and lately Minuteman missiles tests have failed at increasing rates, which is why - mostly for the economic benefits to the MIC - they want to spend a trillion dollars refurbishing all of it.

Personally I assume there will be WWIII, but I suspect it will start over Taiwan rather than Ukraine, mostly because Ukraine won't exist by this time next year. It will end with China and Russia destroying the US and Europe.

I saw a quote by one of my favorite actresses, Winona Ryder, yesterday to the effect that "I give it four or fives years before the world just fucking explodes."

That sounds about right.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts