Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr. Rob Campbell's avatar

It will be a difficult decision for him. He has saved Russia - or, as he may see it: he has 'almost' saved Russia. Will he stay on to make sure or does he trust someone else to take over and finish the job for him. I think it depends on how much confidence he has in possible successors - and there are some who could take over the reins, maybe. I am not in a position to judge really.

Expand full comment
arthur brogard's avatar

Excellent. Thank you.

I'd like to see general understanding of the difference between national govts and their doings and the people of those nations.

What I mean by that is that 'America the people' is not set upon breaking up Russia.

I even doubt that 'America the govt' is: feeling politicians and their policies to be ephemeral.

But ruling manipulative cliques - they are set upon breaking up Russia and have been for decades and will be for decades into the future. I can readily believe that.

Perpetual thieves perpetually eyeing a potential gold mine.

While the narrative is always about the vague term 'the nation' we never get anywhere.

When the narrative shifts to take aim at the government we still don't get far: swap governments for another one just as inept and corrupt.

When the narrative shifts to blame the people: 'must work harder' etc we still get nowhere.

So isn't it time to find and expose these people and keep a watchful eye on them?

Today they are surely more vulnerable than ever before?

Where is their privacy in the electronic age of internet and digital everything?

A rich man of old with rooms full of bullion could protect it with soldiers.

What rich man can protect his wealth stored in digital records in a computer today?

It can surely be revealed to the world by a lowly computer hacker ( or a 'high' computer hacker ).

Let's root them out and have the world revealed and discussed as it really is.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts