Discussion about this post

User's avatar
richardstevenhack's avatar

"which turned out to be so toothless that Iran did not feel the need for an immediate response. So, many of us have now breathed a sigh of relief."

And that's a mistake. Israel did not NEED to make a heavy attack. Why waste military assets that would be needed later to deal with Hezbollah and Iran? Israel knew that Iran already explicitly said that ANY attack by Israel on Iran would result in Iran hitting Israel harder.

So Iran will do what it said and hit back harder. Israel and the US will than have another incident to bolster their casus belli for going to war.

So any sigh of relief is far too premature.

People need to stop talking about how the US is "being dragged" into a wider war. Brian Berletic has covered the 2009 Brookings Institute paper numerous times which lays this exact progression of events in order for the US to start a war with Iran without being blamed for it, by provoking the Iranians in a series of incidents into being the casus belli for the war.

We're seeing it happening now.

Here is the latest Berletic on that paper just six days ago - a must-view:

The 2009 US Policy Paper that Laid out Future Israel-Iran War

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO5ywKinsG0&t=1s

Expand full comment
Anthony's avatar

Thanks for taking time for the regular updates Rob. Much appreciated.

I see some reports that UA soldiers saying they are now outnumbered at the front.

Locally or across the front is the question?

Just doing basic calculations on the losses in the conflict for the combatants for Ukraine's army they must be in excess of 1.5 million casualties now.

My reasoning is this.

When the RF started the SMO they were rumoured to have used max. around 180,000 troops initially.

With the UA around 500,000-regulars and reserves?

UA has probably recruited well over a million (1.5 million even, conscripts and volunteers)

So fielded UA army figure of approx. 2 million..

The RF has had casualties obviously but has only maintained and slowly expanded its army from, what I can see.

So RF has fielded, throughout conflict, maximum 600,000.-1 million?

From reports, state releases etc

So average 2 to 1 superiority in numbers fielded throughout the conflict to UA.

In my opinion RF casualties, are indeed heavy and could well be in excess of 300,000.

if considering all data from RF, Mediazona? Ukraine reports etc.

Now If the RF superiority reported at the front is noticeable then its definitely not only qualitative but also numerical by definition.

We can only suppose or subject it could be a minimum 2 to 1 ratio of effectives.

This highlights good build up, rotation and strategy on behalf of the RF.

But figuratively if RF has fielded 600.000 to 1 million troops and suffered 300,000 casualties.

it is now fielding approx. 700,000 troops.

At a 2 to 1 ratio that would mean the UA army is down to approx. 350,000 troops.

Down from 2 million fielded

Which suggests in the region of 1.5 to anywhere in the region of 1.75 million casualties.

A bloodbath! and apparently the US aid budget to be voted on is rumoured to be released on the conditions of Ukraine mobilising another 1.5 million for an offensive.

The UA know the war is lost, The US knows this too.

The UA know they don't have the manpower to recruit save for children, pensioners and women.

I think the war will be over in 3 months and the misappropriation of the US aid package if it comes will be a final payday for the MIC and Ukraine corrupts.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts