Discussion about this post

User's avatar
richardstevenhack's avatar

" said that no Russian missiles would be shot down without NATO’s consent."

Depending on the Russian missile, no Russian missile can be shot down by anything NATO has in Poland and Romania. I doubt those Aegis Ashore installations are actually effective against most Russian missiles and certainly aren't effective against Zircons and Kinzhals.

Not to mention that if they do become effective against normal Russian missiles, a couple Zircons or Kinzhals will remove those Aegis Ashore installations - which is what the whole SMO is actually about. If they get destroyed in the course of the conflict, Putin might even decide not to take over all of Ukraine, which right now is a necessity to counter those installations.

Expand full comment
Michael boyd's avatar

There's something of the night about Stoltenberg. Gives me the creeps. Russia isnt currently a threat he says? Sounds like another preemptive war against Russia with all the Hitlerite undertones Nato is engaged in. As for Poland and the Baltics. Would you really risk facing down a Russian army on your border?. The days of the old Polish Lithuania Commonwealth aren't coming back- so why risk it. Don't completely agree with the German politician about war casualties. As a guide 90 percent of your armed forces provide logistical support to the 10 percent who actually do the fighting. I said before of the 10 percent who fight only 10 percent actually shoot to kill. Most human beings dont want to kill. The German army in ww2 overcame this by dehumanizing their enemies, thereby making it easier to kill. The IDF has reached this stage. Anyway, in Ukraine because the Ukrainians haven't been rotating their best soldiers have been killed which impacts upon combat effectiveness. The reason the German army lasted so long in the ww2 is that the German army because of its greater willingness to kill ratio and overall training had a decisive combat efficiency ratio over allied troops. A study showed the German landser (standard soldier) was the equivalent of a British paratrooper. The overall ratio was 1/ 1.1 German to US; 1/ 1.45 German to British etc. You see this in the Ukrainian where fewer Russians are advancing against a greater army which in part is due to the Russians being better soldiers. The Russians also have 10 to 1 in artillery and most war studies show that 75 percent casualties are caused by artillery. The Drones have limited statistical impact due to small payload regardless of whether Nato has come up with a super AI drone system which im sceptical about.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts